I'm not sure why I didn't take to Lost Souls. The effects are there, the inventive shots are there, and as I said, the actors are certainly there. Contrarily, the 70-minute running time feels like 100 minutes. 100 wearisome, protracted minutes. Also, it seems that the script labors to cram a novel into a movie, which is something I can't say about the 1996 adaptation. Of course, I'm in the minority. Again.
For optimum non-Universal Lugosi enjoyment, seek out White Zombie. Incidentally, Island of Lost Souls was distributed on VHS by Universal as part of the Classic Monsters collection. I would advise buying the entire collection. Chances are, you'll get more mileage out of this particular entry than I did. Note: I'm padding the rating to account for my persnickety nature.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e03f0/e03f0815d90fa6a1e3baeb214b18e8782406677b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e03f0/e03f0815d90fa6a1e3baeb214b18e8782406677b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e03f0/e03f0815d90fa6a1e3baeb214b18e8782406677b" alt=""
I didnt even realize there was an earlier adaptation than the 70s version, but I am with you Dom I love the Val Kilmer flick. I dont know why it is given such a bad wrap, but then again I havent read the original source material
ReplyDelete